Appropriate anthropometric indices to identify cardiometabolic risk in South Asians.

Background: South Asians show an elevated cardiometabolic risk compared to Caucasians. They are clinically metabolically obese but are considered normal weight based on current international cut-off levels of several anthropometric indices. This study has two main objectives: (i) to predict the most sensitive anthropometric measures for commonly studied cardiometabolic risk factors, and (ii) to determine optimal cut-off levels of each of the anthropometric indices in relation to these cardiometabolic risk factors in South Asians. Methods: The study was conducted on a random sample of 1178 adults of 20–80 years of age from an urban population of eastern India. Obesity, as evaluated by standard anthropometric indices of BMI (body mass index), WC (waist circumference), WHpR (waist-to-hip ratio) and WHtR (waist-to-height ratio), was individually correlated with cardiometabolic risk factors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed which includes: (i) the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analysis to assess the predictive validity of each cardiometabolic risk factor; and (ii) Youden index to determine optimal cut-off levels of each of the anthropometric indices. Results: Overall, AUROC values for WHtR were the highest, but showed variations within the sexes for each of the cardiometabolic risk factors studied. Further, WHpR cut-offs were higher for men (0.93–0.95) than women (0.85–0.88). WC cut-offs were 84.5–89.5 cm in men and 77.5–82.0 cm in women. For both sexes the optimal WHtR cut-off value was 0.51–0.55. The optimal BMI cut-offs were 23.4–24.2 kg/m2 in men and 23.6–25.3 kg/m2 in women. Conclusion: WHtR may be a better anthropometric marker of cardiometabolic risks in South Asian adults than BMI, WC or WHpR.

Smoking and cardiovascular health: A review of the epidemiology, pathogenesis, prevention and control of tobacco.

The causal associations between cigarette smoking and human diseases are irrefutable. In this review, we focus on the epidemiological pattern of cigarette smoking on cardiovascular risk, the underlying mechanistic process of such a causal link, how to prevent premature cardiovascular morbidity and mortality particularly through smoking cessation, and the health benefits of such cessation measures. Finally, we conclude our review summarizing a few of the proven evidence-based tobacco control strategies and policies from across the globe. We did not conduct a systematic review but followed a similar structure. We abstracted the most relevant published literature on the electronic databases, namely, PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library applying specific search terms. We also searched gray literature and consulted experts in the field for cross-references. Smoking has been estimated to cause about 11% of all deaths due to cardiovascular disease. Smoking contributes to the pathogenesis of coronary artery disease and sudden death through a variety of mechanisms, including the promotion of atherosclerosis, the triggering of coronary thrombosis, coronary artery spasm, and cardiac arrhythmias, and through reduced capacity of the blood to deliver oxygen. Smoking cessation also confers substantial benefits on people with serious heart disease. Smoking cessation should be viewed as therapeutic rather than preventive intervention, similar to treating asymptomatic hypertension. Smoking cessation is highly cost-effective relative to other frequently used medical and surgical interventions. Tobacco related illnesses are important public health issues worldwide. It has been estimated that there are1.1 billion smokers worldwide and 250 million of them live in India.

Physical inactivity: a cardiovascular risk factor.

Evidence regarding health benefits of physical activity is overwhelming and plays a critical role in both the primary and secondary prevention of coronary artery disease (CAD). Epidemiological investigations show approximately half the incidence of CAD in active compared to sedentary persons. A sedentary lifestyle is considered by various national and international organizations to be one of the most important modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Fortunately, a moderate level of occupational or recreational activity appears to confer a significant protective effect. Once coronary artery disease has become manifest, exercise training can clearly improve the functional capacity of patients and reduce overall mortality by decreasing the risk of sudden death. Well-designed clinical investigations, supported by basic animal studies, have demonstrated that the beneficial effects of exercise are related to direct and indirect protective mechanisms. These benefits may result from an improvement in cardiovascular risk factors, enhanced fibrinolysis, improved endothelial function, decreased sympathetic tone, and other as-yet-undetermined factors. Hence physical fitness, more than the absence of ponderosity or other factors, is the major determinant of cardiovascular and metabolic risk and long-term disease-free survival, in effect linking health span to life span. It is obviously in every individual's interest to assume the responsibility for his or her own health and embrace this extremely effective, safe, and inexpensive treatment modality. The need for a comprehensive review of this particular topic has arisen in view of the high prevalence of physical inactivity and overwhelming evidence regarding CVD risk reduction with regular physical activity.